Crystal Palace stuns Fulham 3-2 at Craven Cottage despite playing on scraps of possession
Fulham controlled the game with 64.7% possession and 25 shots, but Crystal Palace's efficiency on the counter proved decisive.

Fulham dominated, fired off 25 shots and still walked away from Craven Cottage empty-handed. Crystal Palace won 3-2 despite playing with only scraps of the ball, and that contradiction is exactly the story of this match.
Things started well for the home side. In the 10th minute, Josh King finished with his left foot after a counterattack to make it 1-0, and three minutes later Crystal Palace thought they had equalized through a Daichi Kamada goal that VAR ruled out after review. It looked like Fulham's afternoon, as they clearly held the initiative. But Crystal Palace, far sharper with less of the ball, found the equalizer in the 34th minute through Tyrick Mitchell, who slotted home low after an assist from Eddie Nketiah on another counter. Fulham answered almost immediately: in the 41st minute, Cesar Palacios made it 2-1 with a low shot just inside the post, and that's how the sides went into the break.
Crystal Palace's response
In the second half, the script repeated itself. Mitchell struck again in the 53rd minute for his brace, making it 2-2 after Fulham once more failed to clear danger inside their own box. Fulham kept pushing, creating chances through Gonzalo Garcia, Cesar Palacios and Oscar Bobb, but couldn't find a way through. And Crystal Palace, again striking with surgical precision, turned the game around for good in the 76th minute: Ben Chilwell, who had come on for the injured Mitchell, finished with his left foot into the middle of the goal after a Kamada assist, making it a final score of 2-3.
The stat that sums up the afternoon is the gap between volume and efficiency. Fulham had 64.7% possession and took 25 shots to Crystal Palace's 10, but only produced one big chance compared to four for the visitors. That's the key: Crystal Palace played patiently, waited for the spaces to open up, and punished them ruthlessly on the counterattack.
| Stat | Fulham | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| Possession (%) | 64.7 | 35.3 |
| Shots | 25 | 10 |
| Shots on target | 6 | 5 |
| Big chances | 1 | 4 |
| Corners | 7 | 1 |
| Passes | 672 | 369 |
| Fouls committed | 6 | 7 |
The post-match xG, an in-house estimate based on shot location, has Fulham at 2.90 against Crystal Palace's 2.47: numbers close enough to show a match more even than the scoreline suggests, and confirmation that it was efficiency, not danger created, that ultimately tipped the balance.
What the result means in the standings
In the Premier League table, Fulham remain pointless after three matches, with zero wins, zero draws and three losses. Crystal Palace, with one win, no draws and two losses in the same number of games, sit on three points with a goal difference of -4. Just 3 points separate the two sides, though it's still early to draw any firm conclusions about either team's start to the season.
For Fulham, it's a bitter pill: dominating possession, corners and shot volume wasn't enough to secure all three points. For Crystal Palace, on the other hand, the match confirms they can do damage with very little, something Mitchell's brace and Chilwell's goal made abundantly clear at Craven Cottage.
ATH
RSO
VAN
SEA
MAR
TOU
SMT
COL
SUP
CAV
GRE
ATL
GUA
BOL
CCP
OLI
CAG
UNI
LEX
COS
GUA
LIB
BEL
BAC
NOB
UNI
BRA
FAM
JUV
NAP
DAN
NAC
ATL
TOR
NSH
RBNY
NE
MIA
LAF
MIN
POR
HOU
CSL
NCX
CAZ
LEO
GTI
QAC
VAR
MOR
ISF
ONC
ATL
ALI
AGU
FAS
ANT
MUN
GUA
COB
COM
MIX
MOT
MAR
OLA
FCU
CAR
LA
BOS
BAY
SD
GFC
UTA
HOU
POR