Toronto FC stuns Revolution with unlikely win at BMO Field
The Canadian side won 2-1 thanks to an own goal and a Dorsch assist, while New England dominated but couldn't convert its edge into results.

Toronto FC picked up a win as valuable as it was unexpected, edging New England Revolution 2-1 at BMO Field in an MLS clash in which the Canadian side weathered a barrage of visiting attacks and held on even after being reduced to ten men. The result leaves a bittersweet taste for the Revolution, who dominated nearly every facet of the game but still couldn't avoid defeat.
An own goal opened the door
The first half was far from a preview of the final scoreline. New England pressed from the opening whistle with Carles Gil pulling the strings and Matt Polster testing his luck from distance, but it was Toronto that struck first thanks to a defensive mishap: in the 42nd minute, an own goal by Will Sands made it 1-0 for the hosts, a tough blow given the tempo the visitors had set.
The pain continued just after the restart. In the 50th minute, Niklas Dorsch doubled the lead with a right-footed strike from outside the box that flew into the top corner, set up by Djordje Mihailovic. The 2-0 scoreline looked like it might settle the match, but what followed added plenty of drama.
With the lead in hand, Toronto took a psychological and numerical hit: in the 75th minute, Mihailovic himself, the provider of the assist for the second goal, was shown a red card. Down to ten men, the home side pulled back and absorbed wave after wave of pressure from an increasingly threatening Revolution side. The reward came in stoppage time: in the 89th minute, Wilson Harris headed home a cross from Jack Harrison after a corner kick to make it a 2-1 final, with no time left for a response.
Overwhelming dominance that wasn't enough
The stats confirm the scoreline didn't reflect how the game actually played out. New England Revolution controlled possession and created far more chances than their opponents.
| Stat | Toronto FC | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| Possession (%) | 29.4 | 70.6 |
| Shots | 3 | 24 |
| Shots on target | 1 | 7 |
| Big chances | - | 4 |
| Corners | - | 9 |
| Passes | 264 | 622 |
| Fouls committed | 11 | 5 |
The post-match expected goals figures, calculated from the location of each shot taken, back up that dominance: Toronto FC generated just 0.21 xG compared to 3.27 for the Revolution. That gap shows just how badly the visitors struggled to turn their control of the game into goals, and how much Toronto benefited from clinical finishing and an opponent that wasted too many chances.
A result that defied the odds
The pre-match projection gave Toronto FC a 45% chance of winning, a 25% chance of a draw and a 30% chance of a New England Revolution victory, with a combined expected goals total of 3.37 between both teams. In the end, the outcome lined up with what looked like the least likely scenario based on how the match unfolded: Toronto won despite being thoroughly outplayed statistically, proof that efficiency and the game's key moments (the own goal and Dorsch's finish) mattered more than the volume of chances created by the opponent.
What it means in the standings
In the Eastern Conference, New England Revolution holds on to third place with 30 points from 19 games played, while Toronto FC sits 12th with 20 points from the same number of matches, a 10-point gap between the two sides. For the Revolution, the loss interrupts a run that had them in the hunt for a top spot in the standings; for Toronto, it's an unexpected win that lets them collect all three points despite a clear disadvantage in terms of play on the field. There's also uncertainty now about how Mihailovic's red card will affect the Canadian side's upcoming fixtures.
SXU
DLK
BRO
MAL
ROS
PIT
LTU
AZE
AUT
KVX
DEN
WAL
GIB
AND
SRB
NED
GER
GRE
ISR
IRL
NOR
POR
CHN
NZL
MLT
LIE
BOL
PAR
CLB
MIA
PUM
ASL
LEO
FCJ
NCX
CFA
AUR
MAR
GUY
CAY
HAI
CRC
CUW
NCA
DMA
PUR
TRI
DOM
ALM
NUE
ATL
AGR
DEB
FER
AND
MOR
MIT
STE
PAT
SAM
MAI
TEM
MID
TRI
RCO
GOD
GTI
ATR
GJU
SMT
STU
FAK