FAI
KHO
KHA
FEI
RFS
SPN
M69
FKG
AZ
HBS
CEL
OMO
LPO
B04
LYN
CRY
RBS
MIL
ACS
LSK
TOR
SUN
STG
RSO
REN
OFI
JAG
ARM
NEC
LEV
MAR
OLY
SLB
CEL
BOU
STU
CEL
JUV
DIN
AND
FTC
PLZ
TSG
BJK
EST
FLA
HUR
GLP
HAZ
FAT
BOT
COR
COL
SFE
EQU
LLA
CAE
XEL
COB
MUN
MAR
OLA
OLI
ESP
RY2
KHO
KHA
BID
Playing now
Live| Season | Team | Competition | MP | Min | G | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025/26 |  Seoul | AFC Champions League | 3 | 270 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025/26 | Seoul | Korean K-League Classic | 9 | 679 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024/25 | Seoul | Korean K-League Classic | 8 | 720 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023/24 | Seoul | Korean K-League Classic | 11 | 990 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022/23 |  Bucheon FC | Korean K-League 2 | 38 | 3,420 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021/22 | Bucheon FC | Korean K-League 2 | 0 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019/20 | Bucheon FC | Korean Relegation / Promotion Play-offs | 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019/20 | Bucheon FC | Korean K-League 2 | 34 | 3,060 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018/19 | Bucheon FC | Korean K-League 2 | 30 | 2,700 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 seasons | 134 | 13,369 | 0 | 0 |
AFC Champions League
2025/26Compared with 20 players in the same position in 2025/26.
Value: per 90 minutes played, except the percentages. Percentile: how many of those players rank below, from 0 to 100. The dotted ring on the chart is the 50th percentile, meaning the average for the position.
Small sample so far: few matches played.
| Metric | Value | Percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 2.67 | 50 |
| Save % | 80% | 85 |
| Clean sheets | 33% | 48 |
| High claims | 0.67 | 57 |
| Pass accuracy | 60% | 35 |
| Long passing | 34% | 25 |
| Metric | Total |
|---|---|
| Clearances | 5 |
| Saves | 8 |
| Clean sheets | 1 |
Korean K-League Classic
2025/26Compared with 20 players in the same position in 2025/26.
Value: per 90 minutes played, except the percentages. Percentile: how many of those players rank below, from 0 to 100. The dotted ring on the chart is the 50th percentile, meaning the average for the position.
| Metric | Value | Percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 2.92 | 33 |
| Save % | 65% | 13 |
| Clean sheets | 11% | 13 |
| High claims | 0.40 | 23 |
| Pass accuracy | 72% | 83 |
| Long passing | 33% | 8 |
| Metric | Total |
|---|---|
| Clearances | 9 |
| Saves | 22 |
| Clean sheets | 1 |
Korean K-League Classic
2024/25Compared with 21 players in the same position in 2024/25.
Value: per 90 minutes played, except the percentages. Percentile: how many of those players rank below, from 0 to 100. The dotted ring on the chart is the 50th percentile, meaning the average for the position.
| Metric | Value | Percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 3.25 | 69 |
| Save % | 70% | 60 |
| Clean sheets | 38% | 86 |
| High claims | 0.63 | 40 |
| Pass accuracy | 69% | 50 |
| Long passing | 34% | 7 |
| Metric | Total |
|---|---|
| Clearances | 6 |
| Saves | 26 |
| Clean sheets | 3 |
Korean K-League Classic
2023/24Compared with 20 players in the same position in 2023/24.
Value: per 90 minutes played, except the percentages. Percentile: how many of those players rank below, from 0 to 100. The dotted ring on the chart is the 50th percentile, meaning the average for the position.
| Metric | Value | Percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 2.73 | 38 |
| Save % | 75% | 78 |
| Clean sheets | 27% | 48 |
| High claims | 0.36 | 3 |
| Pass accuracy | 68% | 73 |
| Long passing | 35% | 33 |
| Metric | Total |
|---|---|
| Clearances | 10 |
| Saves | 30 |
| Clean sheets | 3 |
Korean K-League 2
2022/23Compared with 20 players in the same position in 2022/23.
Value: per 90 minutes played, except the percentages. Percentile: how many of those players rank below, from 0 to 100. The dotted ring on the chart is the 50th percentile, meaning the average for the position.
| Metric | Value | Percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 2.92 | 43 |
| Save % | 74% | 83 |
| Clean sheets | 32% | 63 |
| High claims | 0.45 | 13 |
| Pass accuracy | 50% | 38 |
| Long passing | 33% | 33 |
| Metric | Total |
|---|---|
| Big chances created | 1 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
| Clearances | 41 |
| Saves | 111 |
| Clean sheets | 12 |
Korean K-League 2
2021/22Compared with 19 players in the same position in 2021/22.
Value: per 90 minutes played, except the percentages. Percentile: how many of those players rank below, from 0 to 100. The dotted ring on the chart is the 50th percentile, meaning the average for the position.
No data in this competition: Clean sheets.
| Metric | Value | Percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 3.50 | 89 |
| Save % | 72% | 71 |
| High claims | 0.44 | 13 |
| Pass accuracy | 42% | 13 |
| Long passing | 27% | 3 |
| Metric | Total |
|---|---|
| Big chances created | 1 |
| Interceptions | 3 |
| Clearances | 32 |
| Saves | 56 |
| Clean sheets | 4 |
Korean K-League Classic
2020/21No stats available right now.
Korean Relegation / Promotion Play-offs
2019/20| Metric | Total |
|---|---|
| Shots | 1 |
| Saves | 5 |
Korean K-League 2
2019/20| Metric | Total |
|---|---|
| Dribbles completed | 1 |
| Tackles won | 1 |
| Clearances | 37 |
| Saves | 96 |
| Clean sheets | 6 |
Korean K-League 2
2018/19| Metric | Total |
|---|---|
| Clearances | 54 |
| Saves | 102 |
| Clean sheets | 7 |
Recent matches
| Match | Min | G | A | Sv | GA | Cl | Pun | Pass | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/10Melbourne CityE1-1 | 90' | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 20/40 | 6.0 |
| 09/30Buriram UnitedG3-0 | 90' | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 16/20 | 7.9 |
| 09/16AwayMachida ZelviaE1-1 | 90' | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 20/33 | 6.6 |
| 07/31BarcelonaP3-7 | 45' | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 4/9 | 6.4 |