CTJ
ATS
SLV
MTQ
KHA
POL
GEO
NIR
ARM
LVA
HUN
UKR
ITA
BEL
MNE
CYP
POL
BIH
SWE
ROU
TUR
FRA
AUS
BRA
IND
PAN
ATL
MTY
BER
GLP
GRN
CUB
BRB
LCA
SKN
JAM
GUA
HON
SUR
MOZ
SEN
SDN
ETH
TAN
GNB
NIG
LES
NGA
MAD
RWA
LBR
TOG
BDI
MWI
SSD
GAM
SOM
ALG
ZAM
MAR
GAB
MLI
CPV
EGY
ANG
BFA
BEN
SAB
RPO
AUR
NAL
CAR
CAV
SUP
WXW
GXH
Playing now
Live| Season | Team | Competition | MP | Min | G | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024/25 |  Daegu | Korean K-League Classic | 12 | 1,035 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023/24 | Daegu | Korean K-League Classic | 18 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022/23 | Daegu | AFC Champions League | 2 | 180 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022/23 | Daegu | Korean K-League Classic | 2 | 103 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021/22 | Daegu | AFC Champions League | 7 | 611 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021/22 | Daegu | Korean K-League Classic | 36 | 3,230 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020/21 | Daegu | Korean K-League Classic | 10 | 900 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019/20 | Daegu | Korean K-League Classic | 1 | 64 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018/19 | Daegu | Korean K-League Classic | 10 | 900 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 seasons | 98 | 8,598 | 0 | 0 |
Korean K-League Classic
2025/26No stats available right now.
Korean K-League Classic
2024/25Compared with 21 players in the same position in 2024/25.
Value: per 90 minutes played, except the percentages. Percentile: how many of those players rank below, from 0 to 100. The dotted ring on the chart is the 50th percentile, meaning the average for the position.
| Metric | Value | Percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 2.70 | 36 |
| Save % | 67% | 31 |
| Clean sheets | 25% | 50 |
| High claims | 0.96 | 74 |
| Pass accuracy | 54% | 2 |
| Long passing | 37% | 31 |
| Metric | Total |
|---|---|
| Big chances created | 1 |
| Clearances | 13 |
| Saves | 31 |
| Clean sheets | 3 |
Korean Relegation / Promotion Play-offs
2024/25No stats available right now.
Korean K-League Classic
2023/24Compared with 20 players in the same position in 2023/24.
Value: per 90 minutes played, except the percentages. Percentile: how many of those players rank below, from 0 to 100. The dotted ring on the chart is the 50th percentile, meaning the average for the position.
| Metric | Value | Percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 2.23 | 8 |
| Save % | 68% | 30 |
| Clean sheets | 39% | 80 |
| High claims | 1.31 | 93 |
| Pass accuracy | 49% | 23 |
| Long passing | 42% | 73 |
| Metric | Total |
|---|---|
| Big chances created | 1 |
| Clearances | 10 |
| Saves | 39 |
| Clean sheets | 7 |
AFC Champions League
2022/23Compared with 31 players in the same position in 2022/23.
Value: per 90 minutes played, except the percentages. Percentile: how many of those players rank below, from 0 to 100. The dotted ring on the chart is the 50th percentile, meaning the average for the position.
Small sample so far: few matches played.
| Metric | Value | Percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 2.50 | 50 |
| Save % | 63% | 39 |
| Clean sheets | 50% | 76 |
| High claims | 0.00 | 2 |
| Pass accuracy | 81% | 90 |
| Long passing | 56% | 100 |
| Metric | Total |
|---|---|
| Clearances | 1 |
| Saves | 5 |
| Clean sheets | 1 |
Korean K-League Classic
2022/23Compared with 18 players in the same position in 2022/23.
Value: per 90 minutes played, except the percentages. Percentile: how many of those players rank below, from 0 to 100. The dotted ring on the chart is the 50th percentile, meaning the average for the position.
Small sample so far: few matches played.
| Metric | Value | Percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 5.24 | 100 |
| Save % | 75% | 89 |
| Clean sheets | 0% | 3 |
| High claims | 0.87 | 67 |
| Pass accuracy | 41% | 6 |
| Long passing | 39% | 33 |
| Metric | Total |
|---|---|
| Saves | 6 |
AFC Champions League Qualifying
2022/23No stats available right now.
AFC Champions League
2021/22Compared with 33 players in the same position in 2021/22.
Value: per 90 minutes played, except the percentages. Percentile: how many of those players rank below, from 0 to 100. The dotted ring on the chart is the 50th percentile, meaning the average for the position.
| Metric | Value | Percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 2.36 | 38 |
| Save % | 62% | 32 |
| Clean sheets | 29% | 41 |
| High claims | 0.15 | 14 |
| Pass accuracy | 63% | 41 |
| Long passing | 43% | 56 |
| Metric | Total |
|---|---|
| Big chances created | 1 |
| Clearances | 3 |
| Saves | 16 |
| Clean sheets | 2 |
Korean K-League Classic
2021/22Compared with 19 players in the same position in 2021/22.
Value: per 90 minutes played, except the percentages. Percentile: how many of those players rank below, from 0 to 100. The dotted ring on the chart is the 50th percentile, meaning the average for the position.
| Metric | Value | Percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 2.93 | 39 |
| Save % | 70% | 55 |
| Clean sheets | 31% | 61 |
| High claims | 1.17 | 92 |
| Pass accuracy | 51% | 39 |
| Long passing | 40% | 71 |
| Metric | Total |
|---|---|
| Tackles won | 1 |
| Clearances | 4 |
| Saves | 105 |
| Clean sheets | 11 |
Korean K-League Classic
2020/21| Metric | Total |
|---|---|
| Clearances | 5 |
| Saves | 28 |
| Clean sheets | 2 |
AFC Champions League
2019/20No stats available right now.
Korean K-League Classic
2019/20| Metric | Total |
|---|---|
| Clearances | 1 |
| Saves | 3 |
Korean K-League Classic
2018/19| Metric | Total |
|---|---|
| Big chances created | 1 |
| Clearances | 7 |
| Saves | 39 |
| Clean sheets | 3 |
Recent matches
| Match | Min | G | A | Sv | GA | Cl | Pun | Pass | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/18Lion City SailorsP0-3 | 90' | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 7/8 | 6.5 |
| 04/15AwayShandong TaishanG0-7 | 90' | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15/19 | 7.3 |
| 09/14AwayNagoya GrampusP4-2 | 90' | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 12/20 | 4.5 |
| 07/11AwayCeres NegrosG0-4 | 80' | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18/20 | 7.0 |
| 07/08Kawasaki FrontaleP1-3 | 90' | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 12/31 | 6.1 |
| 07/05AwayBeijing GuoanG0-3 | 81' | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10/12 | 6.5 |
| 07/02Beijing GuoanG5-0 | 90' | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11/15 | 7.9 |
| 06/29Ceres NegrosG7-0 | 90' | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 26/37 | 7.5 |
| 06/26AwayKawasaki FrontaleP3-2 | 90' | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 14/29 | 5.2 |