COM
NAM
BDI
ALG
ETH
SEN
LES
MAR
MOZ
SDN
SSD
EGY
MDA
FRO
FIN
BLR
ESP
CRO
SVN
MKD
SVK
KAZ
SCO
SUI
SMR
ALB
LUX
ISL
CZE
ENG
BUL
EST
RUS
IRN
USA
CHI
MEX
PER
VGB
TCA
VIR
BAH
GUF
AIA
ARU
BLZ
VIN
MAD
TAN
GNB
NGA
GHA
GAM
CPV
RWA
UGA
LBY
ZAM
TOG
SOM
CIV
LBR
MLI
GAB
NIG
CGO
CMR
BEN
MTN
FCU
GUA
RPO
AUR
SAB
PMO
COL
Playing now
Live| Season | Team | Competition | MP | Min | G | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026/27 |  Yunnan Yukun | Chinese Super League | 16 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026/27 | Yunnan Yukun | Chinese FA Cup | 2 | 210 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025/26 |  Changchun Yatai | Chinese Super League | 8 | 554 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024/25 | Changchun Yatai | Chinese Super League | 11 | 883 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023/24 | Changchun Yatai | Chinese Super League | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022/23 |  Wuhan Zall | Chinese Super League | 14 | 1,260 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021/22 | Wuhan Zall | Chinese Super League | 18 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020/21 | Wuhan Zall | Chinese Super League | 7 | 336 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 seasons | 77 | 6,308 | 0 | 0 |
Chinese Super League
2026/27Compared with 23 players in the same position in 2026/27.
Value: per 90 minutes played, except the percentages. Percentile: how many of those players rank below, from 0 to 100. The dotted ring on the chart is the 50th percentile, meaning the average for the position.
| Metric | Value | Percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 2.81 | 54 |
| Save % | 63% | 30 |
| Clean sheets | 25% | 72 |
| High claims | 0.44 | 20 |
| Pass accuracy | 73% | 85 |
| Long passing | 44% | 80 |
| Metric | Total |
|---|---|
| Big chances created | 1 |
| Clearances | 36 |
| Saves | 45 |
| Clean sheets | 4 |
Chinese FA Cup
2026/27| Metric | Total |
|---|---|
| Clearances | 3 |
| Saves | 2 |
| Clean sheets | 1 |
Chinese Super League
2025/26Compared with 25 players in the same position in 2025/26.
Value: per 90 minutes played, except the percentages. Percentile: how many of those players rank below, from 0 to 100. The dotted ring on the chart is the 50th percentile, meaning the average for the position.
| Metric | Value | Percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 2.11 | 14 |
| Save % | 54% | 2 |
| Clean sheets | 13% | 22 |
| High claims | 0.00 | 2 |
| Pass accuracy | 40% | 2 |
| Long passing | 34% | 26 |
| Metric | Total |
|---|---|
| Clearances | 13 |
| Saves | 13 |
| Clean sheets | 1 |
Chinese Super League
2024/25Compared with 27 players in the same position in 2024/25.
Value: per 90 minutes played, except the percentages. Percentile: how many of those players rank below, from 0 to 100. The dotted ring on the chart is the 50th percentile, meaning the average for the position.
| Metric | Value | Percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 3.67 | 61 |
| Save % | 57% | 17 |
| Clean sheets | 9% | 6 |
| High claims | 0.61 | 35 |
| Pass accuracy | 54% | 9 |
| Long passing | 32% | 6 |
| Metric | Total |
|---|---|
| Clearances | 12 |
| Saves | 36 |
| Clean sheets | 1 |
Chinese Super League
2023/24Compared with 23 players in the same position in 2023/24.
Value: per 90 minutes played, except the percentages. Percentile: how many of those players rank below, from 0 to 100. The dotted ring on the chart is the 50th percentile, meaning the average for the position.
Small sample so far: few matches played.
No data in this competition: Save %.
| Metric | Value | Percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 0.00 | 0 |
| Clean sheets | 0% | 7 |
| High claims | 0.00 | 0 |
| Pass accuracy | 75% | 91 |
| Long passing | 60% | 100 |
No stats available right now.
Chinese Super League
2022/23Compared with 31 players in the same position in 2022/23.
Value: per 90 minutes played, except the percentages. Percentile: how many of those players rank below, from 0 to 100. The dotted ring on the chart is the 50th percentile, meaning the average for the position.
| Metric | Value | Percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 2.36 | 37 |
| Save % | 58% | 11 |
| Clean sheets | 21% | 34 |
| High claims | 0.50 | 29 |
| Pass accuracy | 58% | 47 |
| Long passing | 41% | 53 |
| Metric | Total |
|---|---|
| Tackles won | 1 |
| Interceptions | 2 |
| Clearances | 17 |
| Saves | 33 |
| Clean sheets | 3 |
Chinese Super League
2021/22Compared with 24 players in the same position in 2021/22.
Value: per 90 minutes played, except the percentages. Percentile: how many of those players rank below, from 0 to 100. The dotted ring on the chart is the 50th percentile, meaning the average for the position.
| Metric | Value | Percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 3.00 | 71 |
| Save % | 69% | 56 |
| Clean sheets | 17% | 21 |
| High claims | 0.72 | 69 |
| Pass accuracy | 53% | 19 |
| Long passing | 34% | 10 |
| Metric | Total |
|---|---|
| Tackles won | 1 |
| Clearances | 27 |
| Saves | 54 |
| Clean sheets | 3 |
Chinese Super League
2020/21| Metric | Total |
|---|---|
| Clearances | 9 |
| Saves | 12 |
Chinese Play-Offs 1/2
2020/21No stats available right now.
Chinese Super League
2019/20No stats available right now.
Recent matches
| Match | Min | G | A | Sv | GA | Cl | Pun | Pass | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/06Liaoning TierenG5-0 | 90' | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 30/38 | 7.4 |
| 09/02Chongqing TonglianglongG1-0 | 90' | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 17/24 | 7.6 |
| 08/22AwayBeijing GuoanE3-3 | 90' | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 23/28 | 7.3 |
| 08/15Dalian YingboG3-1 | 90' | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 15/17 | 6.5 |
| 08/08Chengdu RongchengG1-0 | 90' | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 21/43 | 6.8 |
| 07/26Shenzhen Peng CityG4-3 | 90' | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 19/28 | 5.6 |
| 07/21Chengdu RongchengE3-3 | 120' | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0/0 | 5.2 |
| 07/10AwayShandong TaishanP4-3 | 90' | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 13/14 | 6.0 |
| 07/03HenanG2-1 | 90' | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 17/29 | 6.8 |
| 06/26AwayQingdao HainiuP4-2 | 90' | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 10/12 | 5.3 |
| 05/31AwayWuhan Three TownsE1-1 | 90' | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 14/21 | 7.6 |
| 05/24Qingdao West CoastP2-3 | 90' | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 20/21 | 6.3 |
| 05/20AwayChongqing TonglianglongE0-0 | 90' | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 17/30 | 7.2 |
| 05/16Shanghai ShenhuaG1-0 | 90' | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 32/38 | 7.8 |
| 05/10AwayLiaoning TierenG1-2 | 90' | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 18/29 | 6.5 |