Playing now
Live| Season | Team | Competition | MP | Min | G | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019/20 | Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | Chinese Super League | 3 | 238 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018/19 | Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | Chinese Super League | 4 | 360 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017/18 | Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | Chinese Super League | 11 | 990 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016/17 | Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | Chinese Super League | 30 | 2,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015/16 | Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | Chinese Super League | 9 | 810 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014/15 | Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | Chinese Super League | 3 | 211 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013/14 | Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | Chinese Super League | 22 | 1,942 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012/13 | Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | Chinese Super League | 15 | 1,350 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 seasons | 97 | 8,601 | 0 | 0 |
Chinese Super League
2020/21No stats available right now.
Chinese Super League
2019/20Compared with 22 players in the same position in 2019/20.
Value: per 90 minutes played, except the percentages. Percentile: how many of those players rank below, from 0 to 100. The dotted ring on the chart is the 50th percentile, meaning the average for the position.
Small sample so far: few matches played.
| Metric | Value | Percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 3.40 | 73 |
| Save % | 75% | 93 |
| Clean sheets | 0% | 7 |
| High claims | 0.00 | 2 |
| Pass accuracy | 66% | 77 |
| Long passing | 50% | 95 |
| Metric | Total |
|---|---|
| Clearances | 6 |
| Saves | 9 |
Chinese Super League
2018/19Compared with 21 players in the same position in 2018/19.
Value: per 90 minutes played, except the percentages. Percentile: how many of those players rank below, from 0 to 100. The dotted ring on the chart is the 50th percentile, meaning the average for the position.
Small sample so far: few matches played.
| Metric | Value | Percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 3.00 | 45 |
| Save % | 60% | 14 |
| Clean sheets | 0% | 5 |
| High claims | 1.00 | 90 |
| Pass accuracy | 65% | 90 |
| Long passing | 55% | 100 |
| Metric | Total |
|---|---|
| Clearances | 2 |
| Saves | 12 |
Chinese Super League
2017/18Compared with 20 players in the same position in 2017/18.
Value: per 90 minutes played, except the percentages. Percentile: how many of those players rank below, from 0 to 100. The dotted ring on the chart is the 50th percentile, meaning the average for the position.
| Metric | Value | Percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 2.55 | 33 |
| Save % | 62% | 28 |
| Clean sheets | 9% | 13 |
| High claims | 0.55 | 23 |
| Pass accuracy | 44% | 13 |
| Long passing | 34% | 28 |
| Metric | Total |
|---|---|
| Clearances | 8 |
| Saves | 28 |
| Clean sheets | 1 |
Chinese Super League
2016/17Compared with 21 players in the same position in 2016/17.
Value: per 90 minutes played, except the percentages. Percentile: how many of those players rank below, from 0 to 100. The dotted ring on the chart is the 50th percentile, meaning the average for the position.
| Metric | Value | Percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 2.73 | 67 |
| Save % | 62% | 21 |
| Clean sheets | 27% | 38 |
| High claims | 0.70 | 17 |
| Pass accuracy | 42% | 12 |
| Long passing | 34% | 12 |
| Metric | Total |
|---|---|
| Interceptions | 2 |
| Clearances | 22 |
| Saves | 82 |
| Clean sheets | 8 |
Chinese Super League
2015/16Compared with 25 players in the same position in 2015/16.
Value: per 90 minutes played, except the percentages. Percentile: how many of those players rank below, from 0 to 100. The dotted ring on the chart is the 50th percentile, meaning the average for the position.
| Metric | Value | Percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 2.11 | 20 |
| Save % | 68% | 62 |
| Clean sheets | 22% | 56 |
| High claims | 1.78 | 78 |
| Pass accuracy | 47% | 38 |
| Long passing | 37% | 46 |
| Metric | Total |
|---|---|
| Clearances | 6 |
| Saves | 19 |
| Clean sheets | 2 |
Chinese Super League
2014/15Compared with 22 players in the same position in 2014/15.
Value: per 90 minutes played, except the percentages. Percentile: how many of those players rank below, from 0 to 100. The dotted ring on the chart is the 50th percentile, meaning the average for the position.
Small sample so far: few matches played.
| Metric | Value | Percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 4.69 | 100 |
| Save % | 69% | 55 |
| Clean sheets | 0% | 2 |
| High claims | 1.71 | 64 |
| Pass accuracy | 65% | 95 |
| Long passing | 55% | 100 |
| Metric | Total |
|---|---|
| Clearances | 4 |
| Saves | 11 |
Chinese Super League
2013/14| Metric | Total |
|---|---|
| Tackles won | 1 |
| Clearances | 25 |
| Saves | 59 |
| Clean sheets | 6 |
Chinese Super League
2012/13| Metric | Total |
|---|---|
| Clearances | 14 |
| Saves | 39 |
| Clean sheets | 6 |
Recent matches
| Match | Min | G | A | Sv | GA | Cl | Pun | Pass | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/20DalianE3-3 | 90' | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7/11 | 7.5 |
| 04/20AwayHenanG2-3 | 58' | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3/11 | 6.6 |
| 04/13Tianjin TianhaiE1-1 | 90' | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 13/13 | 5.9 |
| 11/07DalianG3-1 | 90' | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 17/20 | 6.5 |
| 11/03AwayChongqing Liangjiang AthleticE1-1 | 90' | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 13/22 | 6.7 |
| 10/28Shanghai ShenhuaP2-4 | 90' | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 8/14 | 5.4 |
| 10/20AwayShandong TaishanP2-0 | 90' | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 15/26 | 6.4 |
| 10/29AwayGuangzhou R&FP3-2 | 90' | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6/15 | 6.0 |
| 07/14Jiangsu Suning FCE1-1 | 90' | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 9/20 | 6.3 |
| 07/09Shandong TaishanP0-2 | 90' | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14/27 | 5.8 |
| 07/01AwayHenanE0-0 | 90' | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7/15 | 7.5 |
| 06/24Guangzhou R&FP1-2 | 90' | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5/18 | 5.9 |
| 06/18AwayBeijing GuoanP2-0 | 90' | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 10/20 | 7.1 |
| 06/02Shanghai ShenhuaG2-1 | 90' | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 8/11 | 6.1 |
| 05/27AwayTianjin TianhaiP3-0 | 90' | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 5/15 | 5.8 |
HUN
AZ
HBS
CEL
OMO
LPO
B04
LYN
CRY
RBS
MIL
ACS
LSK
TOR
SUN
STG
RSO
REN
OFI
TSG
BJK
NEC
LEV
MAR
OLY
JAG
ARM
SLB
CEL
BOU
STU
CEL
JUV
DIN
AND
FTC
PLZ
EST
FLA
HUR
GLP
FAI
KHO
KHA
FEI
HAZ
FAT
GAN
PPC
TAI
LCS
BGP
ADE
KCI
KIT
SVR
SHS
TAM
MAC
COR
COL
EQU
LLA
CAE
XEL
COB
MUN