Banfield makes its only chance count to beat Racing at the Cilindro
A 23rd-minute header from Alexander Machado was enough for the "Taladro" to take all three points despite the home side's overwhelming dominance in Argentina's Primera División.

Racing Club dominated from start to finish, but Banfield walked away with all three points from the Cilindro de Avellaneda, winning 0-1 in a matchup in Argentina's Primera División. A header from Alexander Machado in the 23rd minute was enough for the "Taladro" to weather a relentless home offensive for the rest of the match.
The play that decided the game
The home side had started the better of the two, with chances for Matko Miljevic and Marcos Rojo that failed to find the net, but it was a set piece that broke the deadlock. In the 23rd minute, off a cross from Juan Luis Alfaro, Favio Álvarez first got a head on the ball that went wide, and seconds later connected again, this time off the crossbar. On the rebound from that same sequence, Alexander Machado showed up in the middle of the box to finish with a header, making it 0-1.
Racing Club answered with persistence. Elías Torres, who came on in the 25th minute after Lautaro Díaz went down with an injury, and Tomás Conechny both tried their luck on several occasions without success, while Banfield sat back and worked to close down space. In the second half, the Avellaneda side kept up the pressure with shots from Matko Miljevic and Elías Torres, but the final touch let them down time and again against a well-organized visiting defense.
The numbers behind a fruitless dominance
The stats tell the story of the match clearly: Racing Club was far superior in terms of possession and chances created, but could not turn that superiority into a goal.
| Stat | Racing Club | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| Possession (%) | 81.5 | 18.5 |
| Shots | 23 | 6 |
| Shots on target | 2 | 2 |
| Corners | 6 | 1 |
| Passes | 646 | 144 |
| Fouls committed | 9 | 11 |
According to our own xG estimate calculated from the shots taken in the match, Racing Club generated 2.50 expected goals to just 0.72 for Banfield, a gap that underscores how badly the home side squandered its chances. With 23 shots to just 6, but only two on target for each side, the match left the impression of a team that attacked plenty but finished poorly, against an opponent that made the most of its one real chance.
What the preview said
Our projection published before the match gave Racing Club a 43% chance of winning, against 25% for Banfield and 32% for a draw, with expected goals of 1.31 for the home side and 0.94 for the visitors. The result went against that forecast: despite being the favorite and despite generating far more offensive volume, Racing Club ended up losing by the narrowest margin to a Banfield side that made the most of its one big chance in the match.
What the result means
In the Group B standings, the gap between the two teams before this match was just 3 points: Banfield came in with 7 points and Racing Club with 4. The visitors' win deepens the struggles of the Avellaneda side, which had shown a promising attacking display but still cannot find the net when it matters most. For Banfield, on the other hand, this is a valuable result earned almost without needing the ball, built on the ruthless execution of a single well-worked play.
ATH
RSO
VAN
SEA
ATL
TOR
NSH
RBNY
SMT
COL
SUP
CAV
GRE
ATL
GUA
BOL
CCP
OLI
CAG
UNI
LEX
COS
GUA
LIB
BEL
BAC
NOB
UNI
BRA
FAM
JUV
NAP
MAR
TOU
DAN
NAC
NE
MIA
LAF
MIN
POR
HOU
CSL
NCX
CAZ
LEO
GTI
QAC
VAR
MOR
ISF
ONC
ATL
ALI
AGU
FAS
ANT
MUN
GUA
COB
COM
MIX
MOT
MAR
OLA
FCU
CAR
LA
BOS
BAY
SD
GFC
UTA
HOU
POR